the abortion video game...?

So, I came across an article on lifenews.come titled: How to illegally abort your child at home…the video game! by Dave Andrusko (December 4th,2012)

This all came rushing back this morning with an article posted on the pro-abortion site rhrealitycheck.org headlined, “Missed Your Period? Don’t Want to be Pregnant? There is an App for That.”
Written by Karen Gardiner, the article is an attempt to put a very dangerous abortion technique in a lighthearted, almost comic light. Here is the opening:

“’To avoid judgement and fear, it is always useful step into the shoes of another person. I invite you into mine.’

“So begins the journey of a 19-year-old Mexican named Claudia, protagonist of an inventive computer game.
 

You have to read this carefully to see how cavalierly Gardiner treats women’s lives. She argues that Misopoprostol (used to treat ulcers) is widely used to abort babies in Mexico and—joy—Gardiner claims, there is no prescription required, unlike the United States.

What’s the problem? “Pharmacy workers often lack the knowledge of how the drug should correctly be administered.” Solution?
Users of No Te Baja, through the actions of Claudia and her boyfriend, go through each detailed step of the process of self-administering a medication abortion: from the initial pregnancy test to the decision whether or not to involve the partner; the signs and symptoms of an ectopic pregnancy to calculating gestational age to indicate whether or not use of Misoprostol will be effective—and if it will be safe to self-administer

Think I'm making this up?

Yahoo voices article: RapeLay -- Rape and Forced Abortion Sim "Game" -- Ban Sought byCarol Bengle Gilbert

 Although the PC "game" RapeLay has never been offered for sale by its manufacturer in the United States, it has caused such an uproar that on Monday, the Speaker of the New York City Council called upon U.S. video distributors to refuse its distribution or sale. Councilwoman Christine C. Quinn in conjunction with the New York City Alliance Against Sexual Assault reported that RapeLay is now for sale in the US - apparently referring to its being offered on Amazon a little more than a week ago- and described it as a "teenage video game."

Made by an erotica company in Japan, Illusion, RapeLay does not limit its horrors to encouraging players to engage in virtual rapes, including gang rapes. After raping women, RapeLay players must force the women to have abortions; if they fail at this mission, they will be thrown in front of a train upon the baby's birth.

This just gets stranger... doesn't it?

On the Jezebel website the article byKatie J.M. Baker,
Computer Game Teaches Mexican Women How to Safely Give Themselves a Medical Abortion

 

Safely???

This article is one big advertisement for this simms game from apple. Many of the articles readers applaud this cheap pill version without hesitation. Any side effects are tedeous compared to the horror of going through an actual abortion... Users receive detailed information on how to administer Misoprostol through the mouth or the vagina, noting that, in the event of having to seek medical attention, medical personnel would likely be able to detect the remnants of the pills inside the vagina- important information for women living in areas where they can be prosecuted for inducing an abortion.

 

remember, you can't buy this game in the USA... but its coming.

What really scares me is just how big of an advertisement this is for the drug Misopoprostol. How they are creeping, abortionists, into the lives of young girls and boys minds.

It's as easy as taking a pill....

....and years ago, they used a COATHANGER before it became legal to abort...

The Coat Hanger Abortion: Fact or Fiction?

Posted by Eric Scheidler (January 26, 2011 at 3:42 pm)

The scandal of Philadeplia abortionist Kermit Gosnell’s “House of Horrors” brings to mind images of the “back alley” and “coat hanger” abortions that Roe v Wade was supposed to bring to an end.
The pro-life movement has been decrying the unsafe conditions at abortion clinics for decades. If we’d been heeded by the authorities in Philadelphia, Kermit Gosnell would have been put out of business in the 90s. We wouldn’t be hearing today about the woman he killed in a botched abortion, or the babies he and his staff stabbed in the spine with scissors after they survived failed abortion attempts.
That Roe made abortion safe is a myth, but that’s not the only myth being spread by the pro-abortion camp. There is also the issue of the “coat hanger” abortion.

The Coat Hanger: A Pro-Choice Symbol

We are told that, before Roe, desperate women used coat hangers in dangerous self-administered abortions. The coat hanger—often with the slash-circle “no” symbol—has become the premier symbol for the pro-choice movement.

Signs at pro-abortion protests typically feature this coat hanger symbol, and you’ll find it in miniature on the profile pictures of abortion advocates on Facebook and Twitter.
One of the most creative uses of the symbol I’ve seen was at a protest in August 2005 of the nomination of John Roberts to the U.S. Supreme Court: a gigantic red coat hanger with a banner reading “We won’t go back!”
On the stranger side of the spectrum was a package delivered to the League’s Chicago office in May 2008 containing two red plastic coat hangers, along with a letter from the American Civil Liberties Union of Mount Holyoke College urging us to support legal abortion.
The pro-choice movement has rallied around this symbol. But is there any truth to the coat hanger abortion story?

Was There Ever a Coat Hanger Abortion?

While preparing the League’s handbook, Sharing the Pro-Life Message, my staff and I searched high and low for evidence of an abortion ever having been performed with a coat hanger. We found none.
That isn’t to say it never happened. We know that women did attempt to do abortions on themselves, using all manner of objects. But I never found any specific evidence of a coat hanger abortion—until now.

Who Gave Her the Idea of Aborting Herself with an Coat Hanger?

What’s unusual about this case of a confirmed coat hanger abortion is that it isn’t one from the archives. It happened in 2009.
I came across the story in an article in Slate on women who decide to perform their own (illegal) abortions, despite the ready availability of legal abortion.

An account of the case says a 19-year-old woman pregnant with twins attempted to abort herself with a coat hanger and ended up in the emergency room. The babies died and the woman required a hysterectomy; she will never bear children.
The study authors suggest that factors like the decreasing number of abortion providers, the number of counties without abortion facilities and laws like parental involvement may be responsible for women choosing to attempt their own abortions.
But in this case, I have to wonder of some of the blame should be laid at the feet of the abortion lobby. After all, where did this woman get the idea of doing an abortion with a coat hanger?
It would be a tragic irony if the only recorded case of a coat hanger abortion was actually inspired by all the hype about coat hanger abortions coming from the pro-choice side.
Meanwhile, as the Gosnell case illustrates in gory technicolor, abortion remains unsafe for women. It’s time the abortion lobby were held accountable for that.

***In the 1970s, there was a little self published book called “The Abortion Handbook” which basically described how to self induce an abortion. It was published by the same folks who put together “The Marijuana Handbook”. One of the techniques they described was to put a urinary catheter into the cervix and leave it there….they also described (but discouraged) the use of knitting needles and wire coat hangers…..

these photos say it all...

No, it's not your body. It's someone elses.

Prochoice keeps saying its their body.








Their choice.

Wrong.


You are cutting, snipping, sucking, suffocating, poisoning (whatever abortion method is needed for the growing baby size) the infant.

Not "the womans" body.

Not "her" body.

It's the defenseless 100% human being inside her uterus.

Because "she" can't see "it" and decides "she" doesn't want "it"
prochoice turns a blind ear and eye.

Prochoice is lying to themselves and they have to keep lying because the lies give them comfort and acceptance.

It's "my" body is a flat out lie.

How much proof does prochoice need before they realise what they are doing is wrong?

We have ultra sounds that can id the baby. Ultra sounds that show a human being living and growing and yawning...

Prochoice has no right to be angry when they see pictures and photos of baby parts on protest signs. Those photos are results of an abortion. ...and before prochoice denies that fact. They need to visit an abortion clinic and ask who takes care of the aborted fetus and how they know they "got it all out".

Lie#1 Roe vs Wade

We are all familiar with the Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7-2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health.

It's all a lie...

Because of the court ruling abortion became legal. Jane Roe speaks in The Norma McCorvey Story. These are her own words. I pulled it right from the source.

In June 1969, Norma L. McCorvey discovered she was pregnant with her third child. She returned to Dallas, Texas, where friends advised her to assert falsely that she had been raped in order to obtain a legal abortion (with the understanding that Texas law allowed abortion in cases of rape and incest). However, this scheme failed because there was no police report documenting the alleged rape. She attempted to obtain an illegal abortion, but found the unauthorized site had been closed down by the police. Eventually, she was referred to attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington. (McCorvey would give birth before the case was decided.)
In 1970, Coffee and Weddington filed suit in a U.S. District Court in Texas on behalf of McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe). The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, representing the State of Texas. McCorvey was no longer claiming her pregnancy was the result of rape, and later acknowledged that she had lied about having been raped. "Rape" is not mentioned in the judicial opinions in this case.
The district court ruled in McCorvey's favor on the legal merits of her case, and declined to grant an injunction against the enforcement of the laws barring abortion. The district court's decision was based upon the 9th Amendment, and the court relied upon a concurring opinion by Justice Arthur Goldberg in the 1965 Supreme Court case of Griswold v. Connecticut, finding in the decision for a right to privacy.

Roe vs Wade is a LIE

Abortion is not fiction

If you are considering having an abortion, watch the movie Silent Scream. You can view it online on youtube. If you can watch that, and it is graphic, really analize the concept of what that baby (yes, it is a baby) is going through because you don't want to take responsability for your infidelity. People cringe at graphic pictures and video of an abortion... they don't want to see the blood and gore. But that blood and gore is an abortion. Some abortionists protest refusing to believe that bloody body parts are real. If you visit an abortion clinic they have a room for biohazardous wastes. What do you think that waste is?

“It was explained that medical waste is placed in red biohazard bags, then placed into boxes provided by Stericycle. Each fetus resulting from an abortion is placed into a hard plastic container and then into a red biohazard bag. The bag is then placed into a freezer, where it is stored. When Stericycle arrives to transport the medical waste, the individual fetuses are removed from the freezer and placed into another large red biohazard bag. The red biohazard bag containing the fetuses is placed into the medical waste box along with other medical waste generated at the facility that requires treatment. According to facility representatives and the medical waste manifest reviewed, it appears that Stericycle picks up the waste once per week.”

Abortion is aborting the fetus from the uterus. As you can see in the photo above you can tell that it is a baby. It has a head arms and legs..

If you paid attention in school. they teach you human biology. Its a lot less graphic in grade school but in highschool you know that the males sperm has to enter the females egg in order for conception.

Definition of CONCEPTION

1

a (1): the process of becoming pregnant involving fertilization or implantation or both 

 (2): embryo, fetus

 

The result of conception is being pregnant. Just because you can't see what it looks like doesn't mean it doesn't have value.

 

Abortion is killing. Taking the life of a human being that is growing inside you. No matter how you look at it or what you call that baby, it is a human life with a heart beat and mind. That baby is wondering who its parents are? What kind of mom is she going to be? What kind of childhood and upbringing they will have? They are listening to hear their mothers voice. Abortion is murder. It is never okay to take a babies life.